<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rotating Architecture: 16 Sweet Spinning Structures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weburbanist.com/2008/09/20/rotating-architecture-16-sweet-spinning-structures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weburbanist.com/2008/09/20/rotating-architecture-16-sweet-spinning-structures/</link>
	<description>Urban Culture, Alternative Art and Wonders of the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:27:05 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ultimate Illustrated Urbanist Architecture Guide &#124; WebUrbanist</title>
		<link>http://weburbanist.com/2008/09/20/rotating-architecture-16-sweet-spinning-structures/comment-page-1/#comment-104330</link>
		<dc:creator>Ultimate Illustrated Urbanist Architecture Guide &#124; WebUrbanist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 09:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weburbanist.com/?p=2439#comment-104330</guid>
		<description>[...] Architectural Movement: Sweet Spinning Structures: A rotating building  is not what people normally mean when they refer to &#8216;architectural movements&#8217; - after all, aren&#8217;t buildings fixed in place virtually by definition? Perhaps these and other marvelous moving buildings are the exceptions that prove the rule. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Architectural Movement: Sweet Spinning Structures: A rotating building  is not what people normally mean when they refer to &#8216;architectural movements&#8217; &#8211; after all, aren&#8217;t buildings fixed in place virtually by definition? Perhaps these and other marvelous moving buildings are the exceptions that prove the rule. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web design company</title>
		<link>http://weburbanist.com/2008/09/20/rotating-architecture-16-sweet-spinning-structures/comment-page-1/#comment-69412</link>
		<dc:creator>web design company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 17:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weburbanist.com/?p=2439#comment-69412</guid>
		<description>Architects have always aimed towards building bigger, wider and higher. Now technology has made a fourth design dimension possible: movement. These 15 amazing structures shift their shapes, go with the flow and put a new spin on style!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Architects have always aimed towards building bigger, wider and higher. Now <a href="http://weburbanist.com/technology" style=""  rel="nofollow" onmouseover="self.status='http://weburbanist.com/technology';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">technology</a> has made a fourth design dimension possible: movement. These 15 amazing structures shift their shapes, go with the flow and put a new spin on style!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Friday Links</title>
		<link>http://weburbanist.com/2008/09/20/rotating-architecture-16-sweet-spinning-structures/comment-page-1/#comment-69235</link>
		<dc:creator>The Friday Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weburbanist.com/?p=2439#comment-69235</guid>
		<description>[...] Rotating architecture &#124; Web Urbanist [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rotating architecture | Web Urbanist [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ?? ?????????? &#124; ????? ??????????? ?????? ??? ??????????????</title>
		<link>http://weburbanist.com/2008/09/20/rotating-architecture-16-sweet-spinning-structures/comment-page-1/#comment-68730</link>
		<dc:creator>?? ?????????? &#124; ????? ??????????? ?????? ??? ??????????????</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weburbanist.com/?p=2439#comment-68730</guid>
		<description>[...] ????? ??? ??? ????????????? ???????????. ???? ???? ???? 17 ?????? ??? ??????????????, ????? ??????? ???????? ???? ??? ???????? ?? ???? ???? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ????? ??? ??? ????????????? ???????????. ???? ???? ???? 17 ?????? ??? ??????????????, ????? ??????? ???????? ???? ??? ???????? ?? ???? ???? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neonascent &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rotating Architecture</title>
		<link>http://weburbanist.com/2008/09/20/rotating-architecture-16-sweet-spinning-structures/comment-page-1/#comment-68525</link>
		<dc:creator>neonascent &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rotating Architecture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weburbanist.com/?p=2439#comment-68525</guid>
		<description>[...] sends me a link to an article in the fantastic Architecture Blog; WebUrbanist.  Rotating Architecture: 16 Spinning Builldings. Much of it is gimmicky, but it gives a great feel for what is possible with modern materials and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sends me a link to an article in the fantastic Architecture Blog; WebUrbanist.  Rotating Architecture: 16 Spinning Builldings. Much of it is gimmicky, but it gives a great feel for what is possible with modern materials and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
