<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV&#8217;s 10 Giant Steps From Boob Tube to YouTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weburbanist.com/2009/01/29/evolution-of-geek-tech-tvs-10-giant-steps-from-boob-tube-to-youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weburbanist.com/2009/01/29/evolution-of-geek-tech-tvs-10-giant-steps-from-boob-tube-to-youtube/</link>
	<description>Urban Culture, Alternative Art and Wonders of the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:15:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Voxygen.net &#187; The Kindle and &#8220;Picard&#8217;s Syndrome&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://weburbanist.com/2009/01/29/evolution-of-geek-tech-tvs-10-giant-steps-from-boob-tube-to-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-160548</link>
		<dc:creator>Voxygen.net &#187; The Kindle and &#8220;Picard&#8217;s Syndrome&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weburbanist.com/?p=7935#comment-160548</guid>
		<description>[...] to turn it invisible. When televisions were first introduced, they took the form of furniture-like clunky wooden cabinets that would blend with the decor of the suburban home. Earlier, telephones were stowed away in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to turn it invisible. When televisions were first introduced, they took the form of furniture-like clunky wooden cabinets that would blend with the decor of the suburban home. Earlier, telephones were stowed away in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smerky</title>
		<link>http://weburbanist.com/2009/01/29/evolution-of-geek-tech-tvs-10-giant-steps-from-boob-tube-to-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-94031</link>
		<dc:creator>smerky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 03:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weburbanist.com/?p=7935#comment-94031</guid>
		<description>First TV was called the &#039;telephane&#039;  and was a hardwired system invented by Henry Sutton,  an Australian from Ararat in Victoria,  in 1885. It was a low resolution electromechanical device using Nipkow disks. He demonstrated it by sending moving images of the Melbourne Cup via telephone lines from Melbourne to Ballarat.  Logi-Baird borrowed some of his ideas when he &quot;invented&quot; TV decades later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First TV was called the &#8216;telephane&#8217;  and was a hardwired system invented by Henry Sutton,  an Australian from Ararat in Victoria,  in 1885. It was a low resolution electromechanical <a href="http://weburbanist.com/gadgets" style=""  rel="nofollow" onmouseover="self.status='http://weburbanist.com/gadgets';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">device</a> using Nipkow disks. He demonstrated it by sending moving images of the Melbourne Cup via telephone lines from Melbourne to Ballarat.  Logi-Baird borrowed some of his ideas when he &#8220;invented&#8221; TV decades later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calli Arcale</title>
		<link>http://weburbanist.com/2009/01/29/evolution-of-geek-tech-tvs-10-giant-steps-from-boob-tube-to-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-92932</link>
		<dc:creator>Calli Arcale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weburbanist.com/?p=7935#comment-92932</guid>
		<description>&quot;When WebTV burst onto the scene in 1997 it seemed like a revelation - access the Internet on your television! Subscribers got a specialized keyboard &amp; remote control, and were soon marveling over the big, bright, beautiful images their TV sets gave them compared to the desktop monitors of the day.&quot;

You&#039;re being sarcastic, I assume.  I remember WebTV.  The NTSC color palette doesn&#039;t really equate very well to Super VGA or Apple&#039;s digital equivalent, and images designed for the Internet don&#039;t tend to look very good on an old CRT analog television set.  And then there&#039;s the resolution.  On those first-generation WebTVs, even hooked up to high-end TVs, it frankly sucked, and the browser limitations on WebTV were an additional problem.  WebTV was basically what you got for your grandma so she could get e-mail without having to deal with a computer.  It was not what you got to improve your surfing experience.  I mean, yeah, you could get a bigger screen a lot cheaper, but not a better one.  There&#039;s a very simple reason why, inch for inch, TVs used to be cheaper than monitors.  They were lower quality.

Mind you, the technology for converting digital output for a television set improved, but those first-generation WebTVs were not impressive from an image quality standpoint, and you certainly did not get better color out of a TV set than you got out of a decent computer monitor of the same vintage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;When WebTV burst onto the scene in 1997 it seemed like a revelation &#8211; access the Internet on your television! Subscribers got a specialized keyboard &amp; remote control, and were soon marveling over the big, bright, beautiful images their TV sets gave them compared to the desktop monitors of the day.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re being sarcastic, I assume.  I remember WebTV.  The NTSC color palette doesn&#8217;t really equate very well to Super VGA or Apple&#8217;s digital equivalent, and images designed for the Internet don&#8217;t tend to look very good on an old CRT analog television set.  And then there&#8217;s the resolution.  On those first-generation WebTVs, even hooked up to high-end TVs, it frankly sucked, and the browser limitations on WebTV were an additional problem.  WebTV was basically what you got for your grandma so she could get e-mail without having to deal with a computer.  It was not what you got to improve your surfing experience.  I mean, yeah, you could get a bigger screen a lot cheaper, but not a better one.  There&#8217;s a very simple reason why, inch for inch, TVs used to be cheaper than monitors.  They were lower quality.</p>
<p>Mind you, the <a href="http://weburbanist.com/technology" style=""  rel="nofollow" onmouseover="self.status='http://weburbanist.com/technology';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">technology</a> for converting digital output for a television set improved, but those first-generation WebTVs were not impressive from an image quality standpoint, and you certainly did not get better color out of a TV set than you got out of a decent computer monitor of the same <a href="http://weburbanist.com/vintageretro" style=""  rel="nofollow" onmouseover="self.status='http://weburbanist.com/vintageretro';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">vintage</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimi</title>
		<link>http://weburbanist.com/2009/01/29/evolution-of-geek-tech-tvs-10-giant-steps-from-boob-tube-to-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-92752</link>
		<dc:creator>jimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 03:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weburbanist.com/?p=7935#comment-92752</guid>
		<description>...and just whats wrong with big groovy analog clocks?

all we have now are tiny plastic black-on-black squares
with microscopic screens and endless menus,
that can only be properly used by tiny Japanese people with
perfect vision!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and just whats wrong with big groovy analog clocks?</p>
<p>all we have now are tiny plastic black-on-black squares<br />
with microscopic screens and endless menus,<br />
that can only be properly used by tiny Japanese people with<br />
perfect vision!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Natural</title>
		<link>http://weburbanist.com/2009/01/29/evolution-of-geek-tech-tvs-10-giant-steps-from-boob-tube-to-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-92487</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Natural</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 06:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weburbanist.com/?p=7935#comment-92487</guid>
		<description>I love the giant console tv/stereo set.  I remember them well.  Seems like everyone STILL wants a giant television, just the definition of it has changed...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the giant console tv/stereo set.  I remember them well.  Seems like everyone STILL wants a giant television, just the definition of it has changed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
