<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Futuristic Flying: Brilliant Prototype &amp; Concept Airplanes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weburbanist.com/2009/04/26/futuristic-flying-brilliant-prototype-concept-airplanes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weburbanist.com/2009/04/26/futuristic-flying-brilliant-prototype-concept-airplanes/</link>
	<description>Urban Culture, Alternative Art and Wonders of the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:27:05 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KENNETH A. SIMMONS</title>
		<link>http://weburbanist.com/2009/04/26/futuristic-flying-brilliant-prototype-concept-airplanes/comment-page-1/#comment-126185</link>
		<dc:creator>KENNETH A. SIMMONS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weburbanist.com/?p=10105#comment-126185</guid>
		<description>I &quot;drew&quot; a &quot;lifting-body&quot; aircraft (flying wing) on my computer nearly 20 years ago and I still hold to the belief that a long, tubular fuselage, supported by large wings, is an inefficient design.  My concept shows that the entire body/wing is a lifting surface that is considerably more efficient.  The tailless/rudderless design features thrust vectoring as well as a type of rudder system encapsulated in the aelerons.  My design would work for either piston or jet propulsion, with sizes ranging from a four-place configuration to that of several hundred.   Although I drew this on an old (now primitive) Corel-Draw program that would be considered substandard compared to today&#039;s high-definition drawing programs, it still was good enough for a beautiful, functional design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I &#8220;drew&#8221; a &#8220;lifting-body&#8221; aircraft (flying wing) on my computer nearly 20 years ago and I still hold to the belief that a long, tubular fuselage, supported by large wings, is an inefficient design.  My concept shows that the entire body/wing is a lifting surface that is considerably more efficient.  The tailless/rudderless design features thrust vectoring as well as a type of rudder system encapsulated in the aelerons.  My design would work for either piston or jet propulsion, with sizes ranging from a four-place configuration to that of several hundred.   Although I drew this on an old (now primitive) Corel-Draw program that would be considered substandard compared to today&#8217;s high-definition drawing programs, it still was good enough for a beautiful, functional design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronaldo</title>
		<link>http://weburbanist.com/2009/04/26/futuristic-flying-brilliant-prototype-concept-airplanes/comment-page-1/#comment-126068</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronaldo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weburbanist.com/?p=10105#comment-126068</guid>
		<description>Ronaldo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ronaldo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lluis</title>
		<link>http://weburbanist.com/2009/04/26/futuristic-flying-brilliant-prototype-concept-airplanes/comment-page-1/#comment-119198</link>
		<dc:creator>lluis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weburbanist.com/?p=10105#comment-119198</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s really interesting to think about it.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really interesting to think about it&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zoran kralev</title>
		<link>http://weburbanist.com/2009/04/26/futuristic-flying-brilliant-prototype-concept-airplanes/comment-page-1/#comment-115109</link>
		<dc:creator>zoran kralev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 20:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weburbanist.com/?p=10105#comment-115109</guid>
		<description>halo halo halo halo..................</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>halo halo halo halo&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Actu-Film.com</title>
		<link>http://weburbanist.com/2009/04/26/futuristic-flying-brilliant-prototype-concept-airplanes/comment-page-1/#comment-111736</link>
		<dc:creator>Actu-Film.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 07:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weburbanist.com/?p=10105#comment-111736</guid>
		<description>Those planes are awesome! I especially love the the humongous J-1000. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those planes are awesome! I especially love the the humongous J-1000. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
