<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weird Military Innovations: 10 Crazy Weapons of War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weburbanist.com/2010/01/12/weird-military-innovations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weburbanist.com/2010/01/12/weird-military-innovations/</link>
	<description>Urban Culture, Alternative Art and Wonders of the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:16:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://weburbanist.com/2010/01/12/weird-military-innovations/comment-page-1/#comment-175731</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 02:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weburbanist.com/?p=17974#comment-175731</guid>
		<description>The Rotabuggy was not a helicopter hybrid, it was a parachute/glider alternative.  The tail unit and rotor was detached at touchdown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Rotabuggy was not a helicopter hybrid, it was a parachute/glider alternative.  The tail unit and rotor was detached at touchdown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dknypg83</title>
		<link>http://weburbanist.com/2010/01/12/weird-military-innovations/comment-page-1/#comment-170983</link>
		<dc:creator>dknypg83</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weburbanist.com/?p=17974#comment-170983</guid>
		<description>interesting!! thanks!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting!! thanks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaffo</title>
		<link>http://weburbanist.com/2010/01/12/weird-military-innovations/comment-page-1/#comment-168658</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaffo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weburbanist.com/?p=17974#comment-168658</guid>
		<description>Yep...

http://www.cracked.com/article_17366_7-wtf-military-weapons-you-wont-believe-they-actually-built.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cracked.com/article_17366_7-wtf-military-weapons-you-wont-believe-they-actually-built.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cracked.com/article_17366_7-wtf-military-weapons-you-wont-believe-they-actually-built.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaffo</title>
		<link>http://weburbanist.com/2010/01/12/weird-military-innovations/comment-page-1/#comment-168657</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaffo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weburbanist.com/?p=17974#comment-168657</guid>
		<description>Um...pretty sure this entire list was stolen from Cracked.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um&#8230;pretty sure this entire list was stolen from Cracked.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GR</title>
		<link>http://weburbanist.com/2010/01/12/weird-military-innovations/comment-page-1/#comment-168301</link>
		<dc:creator>GR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weburbanist.com/?p=17974#comment-168301</guid>
		<description>The US actually produced a pair of rigid airship carriers in the 30s, the USS Akron and USS Macon.  Both were lost in rough weather, ending the US&#039; investment in airborne carriers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US actually produced a pair of rigid airship carriers in the 30s, the USS Akron and USS Macon.  Both were lost in rough weather, ending the US&#8217; investment in airborne carriers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

