<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebUrbanist  Rejected Starchitects: 8 Controversial Building Proposals | Urbanist</title>
	<atom:link href="https://weburbanist.com/2014/09/10/rejected-starchitects-8-controversial-building-concepts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://weburbanist.com</link>
	<description>Urban Art, Architecture, Design &#38; Built Environments</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 02:15:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">74409875</site>	
	<item>
        <title>Rejected Starchitects: 8 Controversial Building Proposals</title>
        <link>https://weburbanist.com/2014/09/10/rejected-starchitects-8-controversial-building-concepts/</link>
		<comments>https://weburbanist.com/2014/09/10/rejected-starchitects-8-controversial-building-concepts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SA Rogers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offices & Commercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Architects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concept architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Gehry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Starchitects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top architects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zaha Hadid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://weburbanist.com/?p=71046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even the world&#8217;s most famous architects, from Zaha Hadid to Frank Gehry, get rejected sometimes. When Norman Foster&#8217;s visionary proposal for a new London airport built right in the middle of the Thames estuary was rejected, the architect retorted that the decision lacked &#8220;courage,&#8221; and that does often seem to be the case, with cities <a href="https://weburbanist.com/2014/09/10/rejected-starchitects-8-controversial-building-concepts/">&#8230;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
    <!-- custom per item content begin -->
    
    [ By <a href='http://weburbanist.com/steph/?utm_source=Mozilla%2F5.0+%28Windows+NT+10.0%3B+Win64%3B+x64%29+AppleWebKit%2F537.36+%28KHTML%2C+like+Gecko%29+Chrome%2F138.0.0.0+Safari%2F537.36&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed-main-2014-09-10-rejected-starchitects-8-controversial-building-concepts&utm_content=unknown&utm_term=feed-author'>SA Rogers</a> in <a href="https://weburbanist.com/category/architecture/" rel="category tag">Architecture</a> &amp; <a href="https://weburbanist.com/category/architecture/offices-commercial/" rel="category tag">Offices &amp; Commercial</a>. ]

    <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">
<html><body><p><a href="#" data-featherlight="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Rejected-Starchitects-Foster-Airport-1.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="first-image img-responsive" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Rejected-Starchitects-Foster-Airport-1.jpg" alt="Rejected Starchitects Foster Airport 1" width="784" height="560"></a></p>
<div id="urb-ads-toc-box" class="post-ads-toc-box urb-ads-toc" style="display:none;"></div><p>Even the world&rsquo;s most famous architects, from Zaha Hadid to Frank Gehry, get rejected sometimes. When Norman Foster&rsquo;s visionary proposal for a new London airport built right in the middle of the Thames estuary was rejected, the architect retorted that the decision lacked &ldquo;courage,&rdquo; and that does often seem to be the case, with cities balking at overly ambitious and futuristic designs. But sometimes, it just comes down to money &ndash; or the architect&rsquo;s ego.</p>
<h4>Floating London Airport by Norman Foster</h4>
<p><a href="#" data-featherlight="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Rejected-Starchitects-Foster-Airport-2.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-71064" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Rejected-Starchitects-Foster-Airport-2.jpg" alt="Rejected Starchitects Foster Airport 2" width="468" height="468"></a></p>
<p><a href="#" data-featherlight="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Rejected-Starchitects-Foster-Airport-3.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-71063" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Rejected-Starchitects-Foster-Airport-3.jpg" alt="Rejected Starchitects Foster Airport 3" width="468" height="323"></a></p>
<p>Land-poor London needs a new solution for an airport that can grow along with the city in the decades to come, but adding new runways would just be a short-term fix. Architect Norman Foster&rsquo;s solution is to build a four-runway airport on the Isle of Grain in the Thames estuary, linking to existing and new high speed train networks. The proposal would use land that&rsquo;s not currently suited for anything else, and would also make it easy to transport good directly to Britain&rsquo;s other container ports. But the proposal <a href="http://www.dezeen.com/2014/09/02/foster-thames-hub-estuary-airport-london-ruled-out/">isn&rsquo;t among the three </a>that London city officials are moving forward with, leading Foster to comment that the decision is &ldquo;sadly predictable.&rdquo;</p>
<h4>Eisenhower Memorial by Frank Gehry<br>
<a href="#" data-featherlight="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Rejected-Starchitects-Gehry-Eisenhower-1-960x539.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-large wp-image-71062" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Rejected-Starchitects-Gehry-Eisenhower-1-468x263.jpg" alt="Rejected Starchitects Gehry Eisenhower 1" width="468" height="263"></a></h4>
<p><a href="#" data-featherlight="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Rejected-Starchitects-Gehry-Eisenhower-2-960x565.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-large wp-image-71061" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Rejected-Starchitects-Gehry-Eisenhower-2-468x275.jpg" alt="Rejected Starchitects Gehry Eisenhower 2" width="468" height="275"></a></p>
<p>Perhaps unsurprisingly, <a href="http://www.archdaily.com/473966/congress-aids-the-impending-doom-of-gehry-s-eisenhower-memorial/">Frank Gehry&rsquo;s design for the Eisenhower Memorial</a> was deemed a bit too flashy by the former president&rsquo;s family, leading to a series of re-designs before the architect&rsquo;s proposal was finally scrapped. The Eisenhower family wanted a memorial that was &ldquo;simple, sustainable, and affordable,&rdquo; and while Gehry&rsquo;s design seems uncharacteristically sedate compared to his usual work, it still included elements that the family and committee found to not be in keeping with Dwight Eisenhower&rsquo;s humble character. Congressional budget cuts ultimately slashed the funds available to the project, and now it&rsquo;s unlikely to break ground.</p>
<h4>Kimball Art Center Extension by Bjarke Ingels<br>
<a href="#" data-featherlight="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Rejected-Starchitects-BIG-Kimball-2.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-large wp-image-71059" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Rejected-Starchitects-BIG-Kimball-2-468x290.jpg" alt="Rejected Starchitects BIG Kimball 2" width="468" height="290"></a></h4>
<p><a href="#" data-featherlight="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Rejected-Starchitects-BIG-Kimball-1.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-large wp-image-71060" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Rejected-Starchitects-BIG-Kimball-1-468x263.jpg" alt="Rejected Starchitects BIG Kimball 1" width="468" height="263"></a></p>
<p><a href="#" data-featherlight="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Rejected-Starchitects-BIG-Kimball-3-960x661.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-large wp-image-71058" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Rejected-Starchitects-BIG-Kimball-3-468x322.jpg" alt="Rejected Starchitects BIG Kimball 3" width="468" height="322"></a></p>
<p>BIG is an appropriate acronym for the Bjarke Ingels Group, as the firm typically designs innovative, futuristic architectural solutions that are sometimes so far outside the box as to be a bit mind-boggling. Often described as a &lsquo;wonder kid,&rsquo; young architect Bjarke Ingels seems to think on a large scale, dreaming up <a href="https://weburbanist.com/2014/04/15/mountain-shaped-residences-with-walkable-green-rooftops/">mountain-shaped residences with walkable green roofs</a> and other unexpected designs. In the case of the Kimball Art Center in Park City, Utah, one design after another has been rejected. The first, a twisting timber structure,<a href="http://www.dezeen.com/2014/08/28/big-kimball-art-center-second-proposal-rejected/"> got the axe</a> for being out of character with the historic setting. The second, a large concrete volume that proved more popular with locals, was thrown out for failing to meet strict Old Town planning guidelines in the former mining town.</p>
<h4>Neues Stadt-Casino by Zaha Hadid<br>
<a href="#" data-featherlight="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Rejected-Starchitects-Hadid-Casino-1-960x684.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-large wp-image-71057" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Rejected-Starchitects-Hadid-Casino-1-468x333.jpg" alt="Rejected Starchitects Hadid Casino 1" width="468" height="333"></a></h4>
<p><a href="#" data-featherlight="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Rejected-Starchitects-Hadid-Casino-2.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-large wp-image-71056" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Rejected-Starchitects-Hadid-Casino-2-468x214.jpg" alt="Rejected Starchitects Hadid Casino 2" width="468" height="214"></a><br>
Even Zaha Hadid, among the most celebrated of contemporary architects, has designs rejected every now and then. Hadid&rsquo;s proposed design for the Neues Stadt-Casino for Basel, Switzerland won a competition four years ago, but Swiss tradition allows the public to have the final say on projects of this size that make use of public money. 62.5% of voters rejected the proposal, <a href="http://www.dezeen.com/2007/06/25/basel-rejects-zaha-hadid-casino/">leading it to be scrapped.</a></p>
</body></html>

<div id='jp-relatedposts' class='jp-relatedposts' >
	
</div><h2>Next Page - Click Below to Read More: <br /><a style='' rel='next' href='https://weburbanist.com/2014/09/10/rejected-starchitects-8-controversial-building-concepts/2'><u>Rejected Starchitects 8 Controversial Building Concepts</u></a></h2>
   
  <span id="fb_share" style="margin-left: 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button"  href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fweburbanist.com%2F2014%2F09%2F10%2Frejected-starchitects-8-controversial-building-concepts%2F&t=Rejected+Starchitects%3A+8+Controversial+Building+Proposals"><img border="none" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/themes/urbanist/dist/images/feed-share.png" width="60" height="19" alt="Share on Facebook"/></a></span>
  <a style="margin-left: 5px;" href="http://www.facebook.com/WebUrbanist"><img border="none" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/themes/urbanist/dist/images/feed-like-mini.png" width="66px" height="19px" /></a>
  <a style="margin-left: 5px;" href="http://www.facebook.com/WebUrbanist"><img border="none" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/themes/urbanist/dist/images/feed-like.png" width="220px" height="19px" /></a>

<hr width="375px" align="left" />
  <a style="margin-left: 5px;" href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=https%3A%2F%2Fweburbanist.com%2F2014%2F09%2F10%2Frejected-starchitects-8-controversial-building-concepts%2F&title=Rejected+Starchitects%3A+8+Controversial+Building+Proposals"><img border="none" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/themes/urbanist/dist/images/feed-SU.png" width="74px" height="19px" /></a>
  <a style="margin-left: 9px;" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=%40weburbanist+https%3A%2F%2Fweburbanist.com%2F2014%2F09%2F10%2Frejected-starchitects-8-controversial-building-concepts%2F+Rejected+Starchitects%3A+8+Controver"><img border="none" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/themes/urbanist/dist/images/feed-retweet.png" height="19" width="48" /></a>
  <a style="margin-left: 5px;" href="http://twitter.com/weburbanist"><img border="none" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/themes/urbanist/dist/images/feed-twitter.png" width="220px" height="19px" /></a>
<div style="clear: both;"></div>

    <hr width="375px" align="left" />

        <span style="float:left; margin-left: 10px;">[ By <a href='http://weburbanist.com/steph/?utm_source=Mozilla%2F5.0+%28Windows+NT+10.0%3B+Win64%3B+x64%29+AppleWebKit%2F537.36+%28KHTML%2C+like+Gecko%29+Chrome%2F138.0.0.0+Safari%2F537.36&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed-main-2014-09-10-rejected-starchitects-8-controversial-building-concepts&utm_content=unknown&utm_term=feed-author-footer'>SA Rogers</a> in <a href="https://weburbanist.com/category/architecture/" rel="category tag">Architecture</a> &amp; <a href="https://weburbanist.com/category/architecture/offices-commercial/" rel="category tag">Offices &amp; Commercial</a>. ]</span>

<br /><br />
  <span style="color: #ddd; float:left; margin-left: 10px;">[ <a style="color: #ddd;" href="http://weburbanist.com/?utm_source=Mozilla%2F5.0+%28Windows+NT+10.0%3B+Win64%3B+x64%29+AppleWebKit%2F537.36+%28KHTML%2C+like+Gecko%29+Chrome%2F138.0.0.0+Safari%2F537.36&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed-main-2014-09-10-rejected-starchitects-8-controversial-building-concepts&utm_content=unknown&utm_term=feed-footer-title">WebUrbanist</a> | <a style="color: #ddd;" href="http://weburbanist.com/archives/?utm_source=Mozilla%2F5.0+%28Windows+NT+10.0%3B+Win64%3B+x64%29+AppleWebKit%2F537.36+%28KHTML%2C+like+Gecko%29+Chrome%2F138.0.0.0+Safari%2F537.36&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed-main-2014-09-10-rejected-starchitects-8-controversial-building-concepts&utm_content=unknown&utm_term=feed-archives">Archives</a> | <a style="color: #ddd;" href="http://weburbanist.com/galleries/?utm_source=Mozilla%2F5.0+%28Windows+NT+10.0%3B+Win64%3B+x64%29+AppleWebKit%2F537.36+%28KHTML%2C+like+Gecko%29+Chrome%2F138.0.0.0+Safari%2F537.36&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed-main-2014-09-10-rejected-starchitects-8-controversial-building-concepts&utm_content=unknown&utm_term=feed-galleries">Galleries</a> | <a style="color: #ddd;" href="http://weburbanist.com/privacy/?utm_source=Mozilla%2F5.0+%28Windows+NT+10.0%3B+Win64%3B+x64%29+AppleWebKit%2F537.36+%28KHTML%2C+like+Gecko%29+Chrome%2F138.0.0.0+Safari%2F537.36&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed-main-2014-09-10-rejected-starchitects-8-controversial-building-concepts&utm_content=unknown&utm_term=feed-privacy">Privacy</a> | <a style="color: #ddd;" href="http://weburbanist.com/terms/?utm_source=Mozilla%2F5.0+%28Windows+NT+10.0%3B+Win64%3B+x64%29+AppleWebKit%2F537.36+%28KHTML%2C+like+Gecko%29+Chrome%2F138.0.0.0+Safari%2F537.36&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed-main-2014-09-10-rejected-starchitects-8-controversial-building-concepts&utm_content=unknown&utm_term=feed-tos">TOS</a> ]</span>
<div style="clear: both;"></div>
<br />

<div style="clear: both;"></div>
<br />
    <!-- custom per item content end -->
    ]]>
    </content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://weburbanist.com/2014/09/10/rejected-starchitects-8-controversial-building-concepts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">71046</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
