<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebUrbanist  End of Elevated Parks? UK Garden Bridge &#038; US Pier 55 Projects in Doubt | Urbanist</title>
	<atom:link href="https://weburbanist.com/2017/04/27/end-of-elevated-parks-uk-garden-bridge-us-pier-55-projects-in-doubt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://weburbanist.com</link>
	<description>Urban Art, Architecture, Design &#38; Built Environments</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 02:15:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">74409875</site>	
	<item>
        <title>End of Elevated Parks? UK Garden Bridge &#038; US Pier 55 Projects in Doubt</title>
        <link>https://weburbanist.com/2017/04/27/end-of-elevated-parks-uk-garden-bridge-us-pier-55-projects-in-doubt/</link>
		<comments>https://weburbanist.com/2017/04/27/end-of-elevated-parks-uk-garden-bridge-us-pier-55-projects-in-doubt/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 17:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Kohlstedt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cities & Urbanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elevated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heatherwick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://weburbanist.com/?p=102825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been a challenging few weeks for architect Thomas Heatherwick, whose proposals for elevated green urban spaces in both London and New York City face uncertain futures. While the specifics vary, there may be&#160;lessons for elevated parks that spans both cases &#8212; and&#160;if these fail to move forward, it could spell the end of <a href="https://weburbanist.com/2017/04/27/end-of-elevated-parks-uk-garden-bridge-us-pier-55-projects-in-doubt/">&#8230;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
    <!-- custom per item content begin -->
    
    [ By <a href='http://weburbanist.com/WebUrbanist/?utm_source=Mozilla%2F5.0+AppleWebKit%2F537.36+%28KHTML%2C+like+Gecko%3B+compatible%3B+ClaudeBot%2F1.0%3B+%2Bclaudebot%40anthropic.com%29&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed-main-2017-04-27-end-of-elevated-parks-uk-garden-bridge-us-pier-55-projects-in-doubt&utm_content=unknown&utm_term=feed-author'>WebUrbanist</a> in <a href="https://weburbanist.com/category/architecture/" rel="category tag">Architecture</a> &amp; <a href="https://weburbanist.com/category/architecture/urbanism/" rel="category tag">Cities &amp; Urbanism</a>. ]

    <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">
<html><body><div id="urb-ads-toc-box" class="post-ads-toc-box urb-ads-toc" style="display:none;"></div><p></p>
<p>It has been a challenging few weeks for architect Thomas Heatherwick, whose proposals for elevated green urban spaces in both London and New York City face uncertain futures. While the specifics vary, there may be&nbsp;lessons for elevated parks that spans both cases &mdash; and&nbsp;if these fail to move forward, it could spell the end of a decade-long trend for lofted public parks.</p>
<p><a href="#" data-featherlight="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/stalled-projects-960x653.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="first-image img-responsive" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/stalled-projects-960x653.jpg" alt="" width="960" height="653"></a></p>
<p>The <a href="https://weburbanist.com/2013/11/12/london-high-line-lush-garden-bridge-to-span-the-thames/">Garden Bridge</a> project in London has long been criticized based on its cost and officials are getting serious about making sure the investment (especially tax dollars) will pay off. The design has been touted as a kind of High Line Park for England&rsquo;s capital, but unlike the High Line it is a brand new construction project (not adaptive reuse) and not positioned to revitalize areas of its city.</p>
<p><a href="#" data-featherlight="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/garden-bridge-heatherwick-960x641.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="alignnone size-wide644 wp-image-102834" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/garden-bridge-heatherwick-644x430.jpg" alt="" width="644" height="430"></a></p>
<p>At the heart of the issue, unsurprisingly, is money: an initial projection of&nbsp;&pound;60,000,000 has blossomed into an estimated cost of around&nbsp;&pound;200,000,000. Shockingly, even cancelling the project now would result in a bill of over&nbsp;&pound;40,000,000, despite the fact that construction has not even started. While&nbsp;&pound;70,000,000 in private funding was secured at the outset, the rest would have to be covered by taxpayer money, which is less than popular with the public. As of now, the mayor&rsquo;s financial inquiry has resulted in a recommendation to scrap the project.</p>
<p><a href="#" data-featherlight="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/undreeath-960x699.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="alignnone size-wide644 wp-image-102832" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/undreeath-644x469.jpg" alt="" width="644" height="469"></a></p>
<p>According to a governmental report on the project, &ldquo;Decisions on the Garden Bridge were driven by electoral cycles rather than value for money,. From its inception when there was confusion as to its purpose, through a weak business case that was constructed after contracts had been let and money had been spent, little regard has been had to value for money.&rdquo; It is unclear whether the project is stalled or slated for abandonment, but it looks unlikely to proceed at this point.</p>
<p><a href="#" data-featherlight="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/peer-park-960x540.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-wide644 wp-image-102831" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/peer-park-644x362.jpg" alt="" width="644" height="362"></a></p>
<p><a href="#" data-featherlight="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/pier-park-project-960x636.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-wide644 wp-image-102830" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/pier-park-project-644x427.jpg" alt="" width="644" height="427"></a></p>
<p>Meanwhile, across the pond, Heatherwick&rsquo;s proposed <a href="https://weburbanist.com/2016/05/29/pier-park-undulating-landscape-to-hover-over-hudson-river-in-nyc/">Pier 55</a> project (images by Luxigon), an elevated park stretching out over the water next to Manhattan, is also stalled out, at least for now. Its permit was recently revoked in part based on environmental studies that concluded it would disrupt local marine habitats. There are also concerns that it will block views along the waterfront.</p>
<p><a href="#" data-featherlight="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/pier-over-water-new-york-960x679.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-wide644 wp-image-102829" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/pier-over-water-new-york-644x455.jpg" alt="" width="644" height="455"></a></p>
<p><a href="#" data-featherlight="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/pier-park-at-night-960x457.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-wide644 wp-image-102828" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/pier-park-at-night-644x307.jpg" alt="" width="644" height="307"></a></p>
<p>The 10,000-square-foot, $200,000,000 park was designed to replace a disused pier in the heart of New York City, but once again it lacks some of the conditions that made the High Line a viable solution, particularly its lack of reuse. Perhaps the elevated parks trend is coming to an end, or (more likely): it is too often pitched as a solution, even in cases where there is no obvious problem to be solved.</p>
</body></html>

<div id='jp-relatedposts' class='jp-relatedposts' >
	
</div><h2></h2>
   
  <span id="fb_share" style="margin-left: 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button"  href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fweburbanist.com%2F2017%2F04%2F27%2Fend-of-elevated-parks-uk-garden-bridge-us-pier-55-projects-in-doubt%2F&t=End+of+Elevated+Parks%3F+UK+Garden+Bridge+%26%23038%3B+US+Pier+55+Projects+in+Doubt"><img border="none" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/themes/urbanist/dist/images/feed-share.png" width="60" height="19" alt="Share on Facebook"/></a></span>
  <a style="margin-left: 5px;" href="http://www.facebook.com/WebUrbanist"><img border="none" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/themes/urbanist/dist/images/feed-like-mini.png" width="66px" height="19px" /></a>
  <a style="margin-left: 5px;" href="http://www.facebook.com/WebUrbanist"><img border="none" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/themes/urbanist/dist/images/feed-like.png" width="220px" height="19px" /></a>

<hr width="375px" align="left" />
  <a style="margin-left: 5px;" href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=https%3A%2F%2Fweburbanist.com%2F2017%2F04%2F27%2Fend-of-elevated-parks-uk-garden-bridge-us-pier-55-projects-in-doubt%2F&title=End+of+Elevated+Parks%3F+UK+Garden+Bridge+%26%23038%3B+US+Pier+55+Projects+in+Doubt"><img border="none" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/themes/urbanist/dist/images/feed-SU.png" width="74px" height="19px" /></a>
  <a style="margin-left: 9px;" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=%40weburbanist+https%3A%2F%2Fweburbanist.com%2F2017%2F04%2F27%2Fend-of-elevated-parks-uk-garden-bridge-us-pier-55-projects-in-doubt%2F+End+of+Elevated+Parks%3F"><img border="none" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/themes/urbanist/dist/images/feed-retweet.png" height="19" width="48" /></a>
  <a style="margin-left: 5px;" href="http://twitter.com/weburbanist"><img border="none" src="https://weburbanist.com/wp-content/themes/urbanist/dist/images/feed-twitter.png" width="220px" height="19px" /></a>
<div style="clear: both;"></div>

    <hr width="375px" align="left" />

        <span style="float:left; margin-left: 10px;">[ By <a href='http://weburbanist.com/WebUrbanist/?utm_source=Mozilla%2F5.0+AppleWebKit%2F537.36+%28KHTML%2C+like+Gecko%3B+compatible%3B+ClaudeBot%2F1.0%3B+%2Bclaudebot%40anthropic.com%29&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed-main-2017-04-27-end-of-elevated-parks-uk-garden-bridge-us-pier-55-projects-in-doubt&utm_content=unknown&utm_term=feed-author-footer'>WebUrbanist</a> in <a href="https://weburbanist.com/category/architecture/" rel="category tag">Architecture</a> &amp; <a href="https://weburbanist.com/category/architecture/urbanism/" rel="category tag">Cities &amp; Urbanism</a>. ]</span>

<br /><br />
  <span style="color: #ddd; float:left; margin-left: 10px;">[ <a style="color: #ddd;" href="http://weburbanist.com/?utm_source=Mozilla%2F5.0+AppleWebKit%2F537.36+%28KHTML%2C+like+Gecko%3B+compatible%3B+ClaudeBot%2F1.0%3B+%2Bclaudebot%40anthropic.com%29&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed-main-2017-04-27-end-of-elevated-parks-uk-garden-bridge-us-pier-55-projects-in-doubt&utm_content=unknown&utm_term=feed-footer-title">WebUrbanist</a> | <a style="color: #ddd;" href="http://weburbanist.com/archives/?utm_source=Mozilla%2F5.0+AppleWebKit%2F537.36+%28KHTML%2C+like+Gecko%3B+compatible%3B+ClaudeBot%2F1.0%3B+%2Bclaudebot%40anthropic.com%29&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed-main-2017-04-27-end-of-elevated-parks-uk-garden-bridge-us-pier-55-projects-in-doubt&utm_content=unknown&utm_term=feed-archives">Archives</a> | <a style="color: #ddd;" href="http://weburbanist.com/galleries/?utm_source=Mozilla%2F5.0+AppleWebKit%2F537.36+%28KHTML%2C+like+Gecko%3B+compatible%3B+ClaudeBot%2F1.0%3B+%2Bclaudebot%40anthropic.com%29&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed-main-2017-04-27-end-of-elevated-parks-uk-garden-bridge-us-pier-55-projects-in-doubt&utm_content=unknown&utm_term=feed-galleries">Galleries</a> | <a style="color: #ddd;" href="http://weburbanist.com/privacy/?utm_source=Mozilla%2F5.0+AppleWebKit%2F537.36+%28KHTML%2C+like+Gecko%3B+compatible%3B+ClaudeBot%2F1.0%3B+%2Bclaudebot%40anthropic.com%29&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed-main-2017-04-27-end-of-elevated-parks-uk-garden-bridge-us-pier-55-projects-in-doubt&utm_content=unknown&utm_term=feed-privacy">Privacy</a> | <a style="color: #ddd;" href="http://weburbanist.com/terms/?utm_source=Mozilla%2F5.0+AppleWebKit%2F537.36+%28KHTML%2C+like+Gecko%3B+compatible%3B+ClaudeBot%2F1.0%3B+%2Bclaudebot%40anthropic.com%29&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed-main-2017-04-27-end-of-elevated-parks-uk-garden-bridge-us-pier-55-projects-in-doubt&utm_content=unknown&utm_term=feed-tos">TOS</a> ]</span>
<div style="clear: both;"></div>
<br />

<div style="clear: both;"></div>
<br />
    <!-- custom per item content end -->
    ]]>
    </content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://weburbanist.com/2017/04/27/end-of-elevated-parks-uk-garden-bridge-us-pier-55-projects-in-doubt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">102825</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
